Organise evidence and chronology
Start with a continuous chronology. Preserve original documents, photographs, medical records, invoices and correspondence. You can then identify which facts still need to be proved.
Damages claims
Evidence, negotiation and limitation in damages claims
How to preserve evidence, prepare settlement discussions and assess limitation risks.
Your contact
Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte · Damages and civil law
Details decide a damages claim: cause, evidence, each head of loss and the applicable deadline. We put these levels into a clear order and represent your interests in negotiations and in court.
In a damages case, the decisive information is often spread across medical records, invoices, photographs, contracts, emails and witness accounts. A clear chronology is what turns these individual items into a coherent presentation.
Under section 1295 of the Austrian Civil Code, the requirements depend on the applicable basis of liability. In practice, several questions must fit together: what happened, what specific loss occurred, what caused it and why can it legally be attributed to the other party?
Out-of-court negotiations may lead to a sensible solution. They do not replace preserving evidence or checking limitation. If the limitation issue is considered only shortly before a settlement, the available options may already be unnecessarily restricted.
Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt
Situation check
Which step matters first in your damages case?
This short check helps you prepare. It does not replace a review of the individual facts.
What is your main concern at present?
Result
Your orientation
Clarify the objective and settlement range
Before the next discussion, assess the basis of liability, amount of loss, evidence and desired outcome separately. A clear written basis prevents important points from remaining only verbal.
Review the limitation starting point
Note when you became aware of the loss, its cause and the person responsible. These dates are only the starting point. The legal basis, special provisions and possible interruption or suspension issues require additional review.
Three areas of review
What must fit together before deciding a damages claim
These areas are connected, but they are not interchangeable.
| Evidence | Negotiation | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Document the event, causation and loss in a traceable way | Define the objective, settlement range and documents | Review knowledge, legal basis and relevant time limits |
| Organise photographs, medical records, invoices, correspondence and witnesses | Avoid unnecessary concessions while keeping the discussion workable | Consider not only the date of loss, but knowledge of the loss and liable person |
| Identify contradictions and obtain missing documents early | State settlement, payment, liability and final release clearly | Check special rules and the specific starting point in the individual case |
A reliable assessment requires reviewing the complete facts and available documents.
Which facts support a damages claim
A damages case is not established merely because a disadvantage occurred. The specific loss, a legally relevant event, causation and responsibility generally have to be brought together. Depending on the case, the basis may be contractual, statutory, fault-based or a special strict-liability rule.
For preparation, separate four levels: event, legal infringement, loss and amount. An expert report may describe a technical defect, but it does not automatically answer who is liable or which further costs are recoverable.
Contributory conduct must also be considered. Section 1304 of the Austrian Civil Code may affect compensation if the injured person contributed to the occurrence or increase of the loss. This can only be assessed from the actual sequence of events.
- Record the event and sequence with precise dates where possible
- List damage items separately from the legal assessment
- Connect causation and responsibility to the available evidence
- Consider openly whether your own conduct contributed
Preserve evidence before the facts change
Save photographs and videos with the time, place and a short explanation. In personal injury cases, keep medical records, treatment information and invoices together. For property damage, photographs before repair are particularly important. If immediate repair is necessary, document the condition, necessity and scope as far as possible.
Correspondence is more than a collection of emails. Sort messages by date and identify which facts the other side confirms, disputes or leaves open. After a telephone call, make a dated note naming the participants and recording the substance.
Witnesses can describe what they personally saw or heard, but not every legal conclusion. Record the direct perception and its date. A clear link to a specific event is more useful than a later general account from memory.
- Keep original files, records and invoices unchanged
- Document the previous condition and scope before repair
- Record witnesses by direct perception, not assumed legal conclusions
- Maintain a chronology with exhibit numbers and open questions
How courts assess evidence and the amount of loss
In civil proceedings, the decisive facts must be presented specifically. Section 266 of the Austrian Code of Civil Procedure concerns the form of submissions and illustrates why general assertions are insufficient. Anyone claiming a particular item should explain its basis, date and supporting evidence.
Free evaluation of evidence under section 272 ZPO does not mean that every account has the same weight. The court assesses the evidence as a whole. Contradictions, missing originals, gaps in time and unclear calculations can weaken a claim.
A transparent calculation is especially important for the amount. Separate amounts already paid, expected future costs, your own contributions, insurance payments and disputed items. This also makes an out-of-court solution easier to assess.
Prepare damages negotiations in a structured way
A negotiation starts before the meeting. Decide whether the objective is full compensation, a partial payment, acceptance of particular items or a final settlement against a defined payment. Also identify which issues remain open.
Separate liability from amount. If the other side disputes only the calculation, that is different from denying responsibility altogether. This distinction helps identify solutions without giving up a legal position prematurely.
Settlement discussions must not cause evidence to be lost or time limits to be overlooked. Every promise needs clear wording. Section 204 ZPO may be relevant to a court settlement. Whether the text covers all claims, ancillary demands, costs and outstanding obligations depends on the individual agreement.
- Define the objective, minimum solution and open points
- Negotiate liability, amount and payment terms separately
- Avoid unclear admissions or final-release clauses
- Specify the settlement, partial payment and further obligations in writing
Assess limitation under section 1489 ABGB
Section 1489 of the Austrian Civil Code is a key starting point for damages claims. The short limitation period generally relates to when the injured person learns of the loss and the person who caused it. The date of the event therefore does not always answer when time began to run.
The actual state of knowledge matters. When was the loss recognisable? When was a responsible person known? When was sufficient information available about cause and extent? These questions must be reconstructed from records, letters, expert reports and other documents.
Section 1489 also provides an outer long-stop period. Special provisions, the legal basis and the type of loss may affect the assessment. A statement such as three years from the accident is therefore not sufficient for every damages case.
Connect limitation, settlement and next steps
A letter to the other side may be useful for negotiations, but it does not automatically replace every step required to preserve a claim. A payment or acknowledgement should likewise not be treated as a guaranteed answer without reviewing its wording, date and legal effect.
Create a time-limit overview listing events, knowledge, earlier demands, responses, partial payments, settlement discussions and court steps. Mark what is documented and what is only assumed. This shows which question needs urgent clarification.
If negotiations fail, the decision on further steps should not depend only on the atmosphere of the discussion. Evidence, objective, litigation risk and remaining time are the relevant factors.
Prepare documents for an attorney review
A short chronology, complete correspondence and a full list of damage items are particularly useful. Add contracts, medical records, photographs, expert reports, invoices, insurance documents and the names of potential witnesses. Include the state of any settlement discussions.
If you have received a letter from an insurer, a settlement offer or a response from the other side, provide the complete document and attachments. Individual sentences may change meaning in context. Personal and particularly sensitive documents should be sent through a suitable secure channel.
An attorney review can then clarify the appropriate legal basis, missing evidence, the calculation of the claim and sensible steps for negotiation or enforcement.
FAQ
Questions about evidence, negotiation and limitation
How long can I claim damages in Austria? +
This depends on the legal basis and the actual state of knowledge. For many claims, section 1489 ABGB is the starting point. Knowledge of the loss and responsible person, as well as special rules, may matter. A blanket deadline cannot replace an individual review.
What evidence is important for a damages claim? +
Depending on the case, photographs, medical records, invoices, expert reports, contracts, emails, notes of conversations and witnesses may be important. The decisive point is the traceable link between event, cause, loss and amount.
Can I negotiate damages out of court? +
Yes. An out-of-court agreement can regulate liability, amount, payment and final release. Before agreeing, review its wording, scope and effect on further claims.
Sources
- Austrian Civil Code, sections 1295, 1304 and 1489 ABGB
Framework for damages, contributory conduct and limitation of damages claims.
- Austrian Code of Civil Procedure, sections 204, 266 and 272 ZPO
Rules on court settlements, specific submissions and evaluation of evidence.
Related topics
Related topics
These pages cover individual types of loss and help with an initial classification.
BRANDaktuelle Legal News
Subscribe to legal updates
Receive new articles and legal information from the firm with BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews.
Subscribe to legal updatesHave your damages claim reviewed
Contact us with your chronology and the key documents. We will clarify which questions about evidence, negotiation and limitation should be reviewed next.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000